The Trayvon Martin Case; Update 32.2, Week 1: The Narrative Spontaneously Combusts

Another great post by Mike McDaniel summarizing and adding analysis of the Zimmerman Trial. He also adds links with further analysis and commentary from Jeralynn Merritt a renown attorney from Colorado and her site, and Andrew Branca a self-defense lawyer and advocate writing for the Legal blog Legal Insurrection at
Thanks Mike, for saving me the trouble.

Stately McDaniel Manor

Following opening statements, the prosecution normally produces a succession of fact witnesses, people who can testify to the facts–the evidence–necessary to establish the elements of the offense and to prove that the defendant committed it.  Their ultimate job is to leave no room for reasonable doubt.

But this is the George Zimmerman prosecution: the backwards case.

Normally, prosecutors are careful to fully question each prosecution witness, to obtain all of the evidence their testimony can produce, and also to avoid allowing the defense to reveal evidence left unmentioned, making it look like the prosecution was trying to conceal something.  But during the first week of this case, the prosecution has established a pattern of asking only the bare minimum of their witnesses.  In virtually every case, defense cross-examination reveals a great deal the prosecutors avoided bringing to light, and in virtually every case, that information either fully supports George’s Zimmerman’s…

View original post 6,079 more words



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s